<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invest a little, gain a lot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/</link>
	<description>An exploratory journey on the edge of newspaper evolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:38:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: contentninja</title>
		<link>http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>contentninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentninja.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Allen: Thank you.

Chuck: Yes, but I&#039;d also argue that the acronyms/names aren&#039;t getting any less tortured. :)

Matthew: I wasn&#039;t thinking strictly national advertisers. If we can create the buckets of advertising content, then conceivably we could put local advertisers in those buckets as well for users to choose from, right? And what if a user wants (it&#039;s possible, although not a given) only local ads?

You also raise a good point about the revenue. We make advertising money by delivering reach. If ads are opt-in, what does that do to the revenue model?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allen: Thank you.</p>
<p>Chuck: Yes, but I&#8217;d also argue that the acronyms/names aren&#8217;t getting any less tortured. :)</p>
<p>Matthew: I wasn&#8217;t thinking strictly national advertisers. If we can create the buckets of advertising content, then conceivably we could put local advertisers in those buckets as well for users to choose from, right? And what if a user wants (it&#8217;s possible, although not a given) only local ads?</p>
<p>You also raise a good point about the revenue. We make advertising money by delivering reach. If ads are opt-in, what does that do to the revenue model?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew M</title>
		<link>http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentninja.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Many online ad agencies let you choose which ads to display on your site. I think it is feasible to allow a member/user to show the Latest Woot! product or display ebay ads based on an ebay category or keyword. 

From a programming perspective it is possible to create these buckets and allow members to embed ones they choose into their page. I am thinking Oodle, Ebay, Craigslist..etc. The shared revenue part is beyond me but damn it sounds cool right now. Another thought comes to mind: is imitation and reinvention necessary to create this portal or do we start on a path of discovery and hope someone else already built it? It is similar to the Apple vs Microsoft history. Steve and Bill are both rich so who really cares anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many online ad agencies let you choose which ads to display on your site. I think it is feasible to allow a member/user to show the Latest Woot! product or display ebay ads based on an ebay category or keyword. </p>
<p>From a programming perspective it is possible to create these buckets and allow members to embed ones they choose into their page. I am thinking Oodle, Ebay, Craigslist..etc. The shared revenue part is beyond me but damn it sounds cool right now. Another thought comes to mind: is imitation and reinvention necessary to create this portal or do we start on a path of discovery and hope someone else already built it? It is similar to the Apple vs Microsoft history. Steve and Bill are both rich so who really cares anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Peters</title>
		<link>http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentninja.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Could this list power a &quot;Lucy&quot;, or Local Information User Community, as proposed by Bernie  at http://bjsmith.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/cedar-liuc-water-liuc/

???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could this list power a &#8220;Lucy&#8221;, or Local Information User Community, as proposed by Bernie  at <a href="http://bjsmith.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/cedar-liuc-water-liuc/" rel="nofollow">http://bjsmith.wordpress.com/2008/05/10/cedar-liuc-water-liuc/</a></p>
<p>???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen Taylor</title>
		<link>http://contentninja.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/invest-a-little-gain-a-lot/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 22:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentninja.wordpress.com/?p=39#comment-95</guid>
		<description>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.

Allen Taylor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice writing.  You are on my RSS reader now so I can read more from you down the road.</p>
<p>Allen Taylor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
